Welcome to twinme.com on July 10 2009.
This is an internet experiment running to monitor browsing habbits of individuals through wikipedia contents.

Doctrine of the Mean

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

  (Redirected from Chung Yung)
Jump to: navigation, search

The Doctrine of the Mean (Chinese: 中庸; pinyin: zhōng yōng), is both a concept and one of the books of Neo-Confucian teachings . The composition of the text is attributed to Zisi (or Kong Ji) the only grandson of Confucius. The term is originally derived from a verse of the Analects which reads:

The Master [Confucius] said, The virtue embodied in the doctrine of the Mean is of the highest order. But it has long been rare among people
 
— Doctrine of the Mean, 6:26 (Burton Watson tr.)

However, the Analects never expands on what this term means.

The Doctrine of the Mean as a text belongs to the later Confucian Canon of the Neo-Confucian movement as compiled by Zhu Xi, and delves into great detail the meaning of this term, as well as how to apply it to one's life.

Contents

[edit] Alternate translations

Alternate translations of the term include:

  • the "Constant Mean" (James, Legge)
  • the "Middle Way" (Simon, Leys)
  • the "Middle Use" (Arthur Waley)
  • the "Unwobbling Pivot" or "Pivot" (Ezra Pound)
  • "Chung Yung" (Ezra Pound)
  • "Focusing the Familiar" (Roger Ames and David Hall)

[edit] Interpretation

The Doctrine of the Mean is a text rich with symbolism and guidance to perfecting oneself. The mean is also described as the 'unwobbling pivot' or 'chung yung'. Chung means bent neither one way or another, and yung represents unchanging (The Great Digest and Unwobbling Pivot, 1951). In James Legge's translation of the text, the goal of the mean is to maintain balance and harmony from directing the mind to a state of constant equilibrium. The person who follows the mean is on a path of duty and must never leave it. A superior person is cautious, a gentle teacher and shows no contempt for their inferiors. They always do what is natural according to their status in the world. Even common men and women can carry the mean into their practices, as long as they do not exceed their natural order (Internet Sacred Text Archive, 2008).

According to the Encyclopaedia Brittanica, the Doctrine of the Mean can represent moderation, rectitude, objectivity, sincerity, honesty and propriety (Encyclopaedia Brittanica, 2008). The guiding principle of the mean being that one should never act in excess. The Doctrine of the Mean is divided into three parts:

  1. The Axis - Confucian Metaphysics
  2. The Process - Politics
  3. The Perfect Word/Sincerity - Ethics (The Great Digest and Unwobbling Pivot, 1951).

Tsze Sze's First Thesis, as stated in "The Great Digest and Unwobbling Pivot" (1951: pp. 99) further describes their connection:

What heaven has disposed and sealed is called the inborn nature. The realization of this nature is called the process. The clarification of this process [the understanding or making intelligible of this process] is called education (Pound's translation (1951)).

[edit] In Chinese society

In China prior to the twentieth century the Doctrine of the Mean was integrated into the education system state wide. As well, one of the prerequisites for employment in the imperial government was the study and understanding of the Four Classics, included in this is the Doctrine of the Mean. The imperial state wanted to reinforce the three bonds of society; between the parent and child, husband and wife, and ruler and subject. This was believed to emphasize a peaceful home and an orderly state.

Recently in China, the Neo-Confucians revisited the Classics, because of its strong foundation in the educational system. Using the Doctrine of the Mean has become a useful source for Neo-Confucians due to the similarities in the terminology and expression used by them and found within the text. This is further reinforced by the support from ancient sages and worthies who prefer education systems more closely linked to traditional Confucian thought.

[edit] See also

[edit] References

  • Dowling, Mike. "Dynasty". The Electronic Passport to Chinese History. April 30, 2002. Accessed: 22, 23 October 2008.http://www.mrdowling.com/613chinesehistory.html 
  • Gardner, Daniel. "Confucian Commentary and Chinese Intellectual History". The Journal of Asian Studies 57.2 (1998): 397-.
  • Hare, John. "The Chinese Classics". Internet Sacred Text Archive. 2008. Accessed: 14, 20, 22, 23, 26, 27 October 2008. http://www.sacred-texts.com/cfu/index.htm 
  • Riegel, Jeffrey. "Confucius". Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. 2006. Accessed: 23 October 2008. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/confucius/ 
  • Pound, Ezra (translation and commentary). "The Great Digest & Unwobbling Pivot". New York, NY, USA: New Directions, 1951.
  • Smith, Huston. "The World's Religions: Our Great Wisdom Traditions". New York, NY, USA: HarperCollins, 1991.
  • Williams, Edward T. "Ancient China" The Harvard Theological Review vol.9, no.3 (1916): 258-268.
  • Wing-Tsit Chan. "Neo-Confucianism: New Ideas on Old Terminology" Philosophy East and West vol.17, no. 1/4 (1967): 15-35.
  • "Zhongyong". Encyclopaedia Brittanica.2008. Encyclopaedia Brittanica Online. Accessed: 27 Oct.2008 http://search.eb.com/eb/article-9082544 

[edit] External links

Wikisource
Wikisource has original text related to this article:
Wikisource
Chinese Wikisource has original text related to this article:


This article contains Chinese text. Without proper rendering support, you may see question marks, boxes, or other symbols instead of Chinese characters.
Personal tools

Visit joltnews for the latest headlines
Visit bloit.com for company information
Geed Media does computer consulting on long island.
This page viewed times. See Logs