Talk:Kleene star
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| WikiProject Computer science | (Rated Start-Class, High-importance) | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||||||
| WikiProject Mathematics (Rated Start-Class) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, which collaborates on articles related to mathematics. | ||||||
| Mathematics rating: | Start Class | Low Priority | Field: Foundations, logic, and set theory | |||
|
||||||
Contents |
[edit] Closure
Isn't closure implicit if we talk about an operation "on M"? (anonymous)
I think closure would be implied by saying operation in M. Tortoise3 12:48, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Pumping Lemma
The pumping lemmas (regular and context-free) are very important observations in language theory, and the Kleene closure is essential to their use, so I think a link to the pumping lemma would be quite appropriate. Any objections? Aragorn2 09:42, 29 Mar 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Definition
The notes that say "0/1 denotes...events" seem to be taken out of context...? Tortoise3 12:18, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Pronounciation
How is it pronounced?
- See here: Stephen Kleene. Hermel (talk) 21:09, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
[edit] WikiProject class rating
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 04:13, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Is V1 defined?
It seems to me that V1 is left undefined here:
where 
Shouldn't i say "where
" ?
I didn't correct it since I'm new in this area.
Nils Emil Larsen 13:42, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
- Fixed by User:141.162.101.50 Nils Emil (talk) 06:17, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Empty Set
Is the empty string ALWAYS in the Kleene Closure of a set? Even the Kleene closure of the empty set? The "given V0=lambda" on this article is unclear. Thanks
Mangledorf (talk) 04:10, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
- Yes, indeed. Just plug the empty set into the definition. (The definition is standard, compare any introductory textbook in automata theory, e.g. Hopcroft/Motwani/Ullman.) Hermel (talk) 21:14, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Idempotence
I think the article should mention that both the star and plus are idempotent operators, including a proof.
--MedeaMelana (talk) 19:41, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

