Welcome to twinme.com on July 10 2009.
This is an internet experiment running to monitor browsing habbits of individuals through wikipedia contents.

Talk:Kleene star

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Computer science (Rated Start-Class, High-importance)
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Computer science related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 High  This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject Mathematics     (Rated Start-Class)
WikiProject Mathematics
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, which collaborates on articles related to mathematics.
Mathematics rating: Start Class Low Priority Field: Foundations, logic, and set theory

Contents

[edit] Closure

Isn't closure implicit if we talk about an operation "on M"? (anonymous)

I think closure would be implied by saying operation in M. Tortoise3 12:48, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Pumping Lemma

The pumping lemmas (regular and context-free) are very important observations in language theory, and the Kleene closure is essential to their use, so I think a link to the pumping lemma would be quite appropriate. Any objections? Aragorn2 09:42, 29 Mar 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Definition

The notes that say "0/1 denotes...events" seem to be taken out of context...? Tortoise3 12:18, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Pronounciation

How is it pronounced?

See here: Stephen Kleene. Hermel (talk) 21:09, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

[edit] WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 04:13, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Is V1 defined?

It seems to me that V1 is left undefined here:

 V_{i+1}=\{wv : w\in V_i \mbox{ and }  v \in V\}\, where i > 0\,.

Shouldn't i say "where i \geq 0 " ?

I didn't correct it since I'm new in this area.

Nils Emil Larsen 13:42, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

Fixed by User:141.162.101.50 Nils Emil (talk) 06:17, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Empty Set

Is the empty string ALWAYS in the Kleene Closure of a set? Even the Kleene closure of the empty set? The "given V0=lambda" on this article is unclear. Thanks

Mangledorf (talk) 04:10, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

Yes, indeed. Just plug the empty set into the definition. (The definition is standard, compare any introductory textbook in automata theory, e.g. Hopcroft/Motwani/Ullman.) Hermel (talk) 21:14, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Idempotence

I think the article should mention that both the star and plus are idempotent operators, including a proof.

--MedeaMelana (talk) 19:41, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

Personal tools

Visit joltnews for the latest headlines
Visit bloit.com for company information
Geed Media does computer consulting on long island.
This page viewed times. See Logs