User talk:Kusma

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Archives
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19

Please click here to leave me a message.
If I don't reply here, I reply on your talk page.
If I don't reply on your talk page, I reply here.

Contents 1 Wikipedia Signpost: 1 June 2009 2 Wikipedia Signpost: 15 June 2009 3 Rhode Island Red, at it again 4 Wikipedia Signpost: 22 June 2009 5 Request for mediation not accepted 6 Friends2support page deletion enquiry 7 Wikipedia Signpost: 29 June 2009 8 Linux templates 8.1 Toth 9 Out of the pool, fella 10 Wikipedia Signpost: 6 July 2009

[edit] Wikipedia Signpost: 1 June 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 22:36, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia Signpost: 15 June 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 11:43, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Rhode Island Red, at it again

Can you please intervene on the Julia Havey article. Rhode Island Red has taken it upon himself to undo edits and make the article basically non existent. He took off all documented appearances, links, mention of endorsements, everything and it is all because of the personal agenda on the Juice Plus article because she dared edit 'against' his opinion.

This is ridiculous that no one stops this jerk. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.40.232.236 (talk) 22:58, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia Signpost: 22 June 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 02:58, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Request for mediation not accepted

A Request for Mediation to which you were are a party was not accepted and has been delisted. You can find more information on the case subpage, Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Use of Sports Logos. For the Mediation Committee, Ryan Postlethwaite 02:21, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

This message delivered by MediationBot, an automated bot account operated by the Mediation Committee to perform case management.
If you have questions about this bot, please contact the Mediation Committee directly.

[edit] Friends2support page deletion enquiry

Hi Kusma,

I see that Friends2support page was deleted, as it was misinterpreted to be "Unambiguous advertising or promotion."

Friends2support is a non profit NGO based in Hyderabad-India, where people voluntarily pledge their commitment to their society by registering as blood donors online(http://www.friends2support.org). We have 50,000+ donors registered in the last 4 years. We were commended by various leading news papers in Hyderabad & India and decorated with accolades, most recent one being runner-up at world youth summit under the category of FIGHT HUNGER, POVERTY & DISEASE(http://youthaward.org/node/88)!

We wish to have our representation on wikipedia, as it will help people get to know about our organization. Also, we have all the leading news papers citing(written dated proof from news papers) our presence and cause.

Now that you know about our Organization, kindly acknowledge confirming your acceptance of our cause to have a wiki page.

Eagerly awaiting your response, Chandan, Friends2Support.

I am sure that you are working for a good cause. However, the article was not an encyclopedic description of your NGO (that should have started something like "Friends2support is a non-profit NGO based in Hyderabad"), but looked like an attempt to advertise for your organization. Advertising, no matter for what cause, independent of whether you do it for profit or not, is not tolerated on Wikipedia, see WP:NOT#ADVERTISING. Advertising would violate our neutrality policy. Another problem with your article was that it did not give any hints about the significance of the organisation: are there significant third-party sources writing about it? From a quick glance at your news coverage, I could see that it was mentioned many times, but not described in much detail in news media. Check our notability policy, specifically WP:ORG, to see what is usually considered worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia. If you are certain your organisation meets these criteria, you may create a new article, but be sure to not just copy from other websites and to cite reliable sources for all of your claims. Hope that helps, Kusma (talk) 13:51, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

Thanks a lot for your pointers. I have completed the article to my best, and I would be thankful if you can do a review and comment on it. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Friends2support —Preceding unsigned comment added by Notifychandan (talk • contribs) 10:51, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia Signpost: 29 June 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 02:04, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Linux templates

These can't currently be speedily deleted without further work as they have incoming links, and another template depends on them. It might be useful to delete that other template and move this one over, but the ones you nominated are not currently redundant. Please use WP:TFD if you think this issue needs to be addressed instead of attempting speedy deletion again and again (you already did so in March). Kusma (talk) 16:12, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

Yeah I did so in March, when there was no dependency, and you guys didn't do anything. If you want me to undepend the other and orphan it I guess I can do that. Then maybe one of you admins will do your job? I guess we'll see. ¦ Reisio (talk) 05:11, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

As I found out that the templates were kept at TFD (somebody just posted that on your talk page), please don't do that without previous consensus at Talk:Linux and/or Talk:Linux kernel. Thank you, Kusma (talk) 05:55, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

The template you tagged in March 2009 was deleted on April 13 and then undeleted on May 20 when I untangled the template mess, see the log and User talk:Night Gyr#Template:Latest stable software release/Linux. There certainly was a dependency on the template when you tagged it in March; when it was deleted it broke the infoboxes for both Linux and Linux kernel. As for orphaning them, that won't be possible without removing the infoboxes from both articles completely, which you certainly don't have consensus for.
Removing my previous comments [1] does not make them any less valid and in fact doing so only reinforces my original concerns over your motivations for trying to get these templates deleted. --Tothwolf (talk) 11:42, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

I removed your comments because they are irrelevant to me, and because instead of letting a duplicate template get removed, you went out of your way to make it more difficult. ¦ Reisio (talk) 18:33, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

I don't need consensus to replace one utterly duplicate template with another, that is the whole reason it's a criterion for speedy deletion. ¦ Reisio (talk) 18:33, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Toth

I've replied to Reisio here and my previous reply (which he removed) can be found here. --Tothwolf (talk) 11:55, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Out of the pool, fella

Comments like this are far too sensible. We can't have that. Short Brigade Harvester Boris (talk) 03:28, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

Must be my insomnia talking. Sorry about that :-) Kusma (talk) 03:30, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia Signpost: 6 July 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 02:55, 9 July 2009 (UTC)