User talk:Padillah
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| Archive 1 Archive 2 |
|
Contents |
[edit] Re:Angela Petrelli Edit...
Thanks for editing that last paragraph, sounds much classier now! Lol —Preceding unsigned comment added by BrotherDarksoul (talk • contribs) 14:41, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
[edit] I'm so sorry
I just noticed the hassles you are having do to my comments on ANI and your helping out. I am really sorry to have brought this to you but I do thank you very much for helping me with a bad situation that I accidentally came across. Thank you again for helping out, --CrohnieGalTalk 16:31, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
- Please understand, I'm having troubles because someone out in the world refuses to play nicely with others and obey the rules. This has nothing to do with you or what you've brought up where. I appreciate the feelings and thank you kindly for the sentiment but please rest assured this is no reflection on you to any degree. This is the sole responsibility of one person and their attempt to run things their way. Happy editing! Padillah (talk) 16:35, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
-
- Thanks your right but I still feel bad. You are a sweetie though for taking care of this with so much honor. It's a pleasure to see what you have said to me, thanks, I really appreciate it. Happy editing to you too. --CrohnieGalTalk 16:42, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
[edit] "Stolen" message
Hello Padillah... I noticed the message you recently left for Popartpete and thought that it was a very well-written explanation that I though would be helpful in other situations as well. So, I, umm, stole it and made a template out of it. Unless you have objections, I'd like to use it whenever the need arises. Thanks —Travistalk 15:50, 14 May 2009 (UTC) P.S. No need to use {{talkback}}, I've got you watchlisted
- I appreciate your candor and feel honored. I'm glad I could help. Padillah (talk) 16:09, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
[edit] ANI thread
I started a thread on the admins' noticeboard that mentions your talk page. You may want to have a look. EnviroboyTalkCs 09:01, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Smiley face killer theory is one sided
I put everything I have to say on the discussion page.The article is garbage the way it is and you seem to be part of the problem.I gave my sources and the information was correct. (Ethan46 (talk) 18:04, 7 July 2009 (UTC))
- First you may want to calm down, maybe take a day off or step away for a time. This isn't personal... no one is "against you". Secondly you were stating information from the article but you were cherry-picking that information to place a slant on the point of view. For example you mentioned that a detective said it was unusual that three teens drowned so close to each other but you neglected to add that he also said there was no real evidence linking the deaths. Those types of edits are called POV and they are frowned upon by the WP community. The article is not "garbage", it may not communicate what you feel it should but you must keep in mind that there are more people than yourself that have viewpoints on this subject and it's in our best interest to represent all those views. Padillah (talk) 14:44, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

