User talk:Ruslik0
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
|
This page is archived by MiszaBot III. Please, do not archive it manually. |
 Archives |
|---|
[edit] Oh dear
I'm sorry I crapped on your talk page - no excuses :( Totnesmartin (talk) 15:23, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Your !vote at Wikipedia talk:Full-date unlinking bot#Support
Hi, could you give a reason as to why you're supporting the proposal? As it is a request for comment, some clarification would be nice (even if the reason is obvious). Regards, Dabomb87 (talk) 23:07, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Your edit to Template:WikiProject Space
Please could you explain why you made this edit. What was it about that that was not working? --GW… 06:59, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
- As I remember I checked one list and found that it did not work, but I was probably mistaken. I reverted it back. In addition, I do not like such "hacks". Ruslik_Zero 07:47, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
- It doesn't catch them all because there are several different naming systems. I put that in to deal with the ones that it can until I get a chance to go round and remove the tags on all of the pages. Thanks. --GW… 08:08, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Don't poke the bear (2nd nomination)
Hey there. I appreciate you going back and changing the colour for me on the MfD that I closed last night. I had a moment of senility and used the AfD template and while I went back and changed "article" to "misc. page", I didn't snap to change the colour. Thanks again :), -T'Shael, Lord of the Vulcans 17:35, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Template:Plazadesoberanía-geo-stub
Thanks for the fix. But why did you add the documentation template? Stub don't usually have them, and basicaly don't need them at all. Debresser (talk) 20:03, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
- I thought that in this case documentation might be useful. Ruslik_Zero 10:42, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
[edit] GA Sweeps July update
Thanks to everyone's dedicated efforts to the GA Sweeps process, a total of 290 articles were swept in June! Last month was our second most successful month in reviewing articles (after May). We are currently over 70% done with Sweeps, with just under 800 articles left to review. With nearly 50 members, that averages out to about 15 articles per person. If each member reviews an article every other day this month (or several!), we'll be completely finished. This may sound difficult, but if everyone completes their reviews, Sweeps would be completed in less than two years when we first started (with only four members!). With the conclusion of Sweeps, each editor could spend more time writing GAs, reviewing at the backlogged GAN, or focusing on other GARs. Again, I want to thank you for using your time to ensure the quality of the older GAs. Feel free to recruit other editors who have reviewed GANs in the past and might be interested in the process. The more editors, the less the workload, and hopefully the faster this will be completed. If you have any questions about reviews or the process let me know and I'll be happy to get back to you. Again, thank you for taking the time to help with the process, I appreciate your efforts! --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 18:05, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Volcanism of Canada
Well, its been more than a month or two later since our conversation about bring this article to FA class. I have also been recently interested in bringing List of Northern Cordilleran volcanoes to FL class, but I am less familiar with the featured list criteria. In my opinion, Canadian volcanism articles/lists are quite good for FA class because they are highly stable due to low levels of vandalism and editing. Why they do not get high levels of vandalism has always been a mystery to me. Anyway, if you are ready to bring this article, list or both to FA class, leave a message on my talk page. The Volcanism of Canada article is getting very lengthy and List of Northern Cordilleran volcanoes is quite broad. I will almost always be ready to bring any notable Canadian volcanism topics to FA class. Black Tusk (talk) 05:23, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Rus I need your help again
I need academic citations for the following facts:
- That the delta-V to get into Earth's orbit is 9.7 km/s
- That a trip to the outer planets using gravity assists from Mars and Venus will take substantially longer than one that merely used enough fuel to travel there directly (obvious I know, but the GAR demands it)
Thanks. Serendipodous 12:54, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
- I will try to find. Ruslik_Zero 13:21, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
[edit] "abuse -> edit"
Was this change discussed? The extension name and special page names remain the same, which makes the result of your change very confusing. Additionally, the abuse filter doesn't just operate on edits, so the new name is incorrect. Gurch (talk) 10:05, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
- There were a lot of complaints, which were discussed on ANI and then on WT:AF. Ruslik_Zero 10:30, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Filter exemption request
Can you exempt my IP from these filters[1][2] while I clean up the mess created by bot? The bot's articles have mostly been deleted, and the bot has has its authorization revoked,[3] and I'm tired of being told my edits to clean up this mess are unconstructive.[4][5][6] --69.226.103.13 (talk) 01:56, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
- I made an exemption for Anybot created content. Ruslik_Zero 08:35, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
- Better idea than the exemption for my IP, as yours also allows the other IP (who probably won't be back) to edit the anybot mess without running into having to click everything twice. --69.226.103.13 (talk) 15:42, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
[edit] "Shampoo" in filter 46
Hi, I'm curious about your addition of "shampoo" to the exception list of filter 46. Since the regular expression that searches for "poop" and variations starts with \b (regex for a word break), "shampoo" shouldn't be matched as a false positive. Since the inclusion of that word might cause false negatives, I'd like to know: have you seen any false positives involving "shampoo"? If not, I'd like to remove that entry. Thanks, {{Nihiltres|talk|edits}} 17:04, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
