Welcome to twinme.com on July 6 2009.
This is an internet experiment running to monitor browsing habbits of individuals through wikipedia contents.

Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Failed log

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

This is a log of featured list candidates from Wikipedia:Featured list candidates which failed to reach consensus for promotion as featured lists, with the most recent at the top Discussions about successful nominations are located in the featured log.

Candidacy discussion about failed candidates in this calendar month is being placed at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Failed log/July 2009.

Contents


Full current month log

view - edit - history

edit2005
June 13 promoted 10 failed
July 20 promoted 8 failed
August 14 promoted 9 failed
September 3 promoted 8 failed
October 7 promoted 2 failed
November 7 promoted 6 failed 1 removed
December 6 promoted 4 failed
2006
January 11 promoted 11 failed 1 removed
February 3 promoted 8 failed 1 kept
March 13 promoted 11 failed 2 kept
April 10 promoted 5 failed 1 removed
May 10 promoted 7 failed 1 kept
June 9 promoted 10 failed
July 10 promoted 9 failed 1 kept
August 10 promoted 7 failed 1 kept
September 5 promoted 7 failed
October 8 promoted 10 failed 1 removed
November 11 promoted 8 failed 2 kept
December 20 promoted 11 failed
2007
January 18 promoted 11 failed
February 11 promoted 11 failed
March 12 promoted 10 failed 1 kept
April 20 promoted 17 failed 1 kept
May 23 promoted 14 failed
June 22 promoted 9 failed 1 kept
July 29 promoted 20 failed 2 kept/1 removed
August 41 promoted 15 failed 3 removed
September 42 promoted 11 failed 1 kept/1 removed
October 43 promoted 17 failed 2 kept
November 40 promoted 18 failed
December 38 promoted 15 failed 2 removed
2008
January 46 promoted 18 failed 6 removed
February 34 promoted 16 failed 10 removed/3 kept
March 65 promoted 9 failed 4 removed/2 kept
April 48 promoted 25 failed 2 removed/2 kept
May 50 promoted 39 failed 1 removed
June 46 promoted 23 failed/2 quick-failed 4 removed/1 kept
July 85 promoted 27 failed/10 quick-failed 3 removed/2 kept
August 58 promoted 52 failed/7 quick-failed 4 removed/1 kept
September 59 promoted 33 failed/5 quick-failed 3 removed/1 kept
October 75 promoted 30 failed/2 quick-failed 5 removed
November 86 promoted 13 failed 8 removed/5 kept
December 70 promoted 11 failed 3 removed/2 kept
2009
January 63 promoted 16 failed 3 removed/1 kept
February 62 promoted 24 failed/1 quick-failed 4 removed/1 kept
March 47 promoted 14 failed 4 removed/1 kept
April 47 promoted 15 failed 13 removed/2 kept
May 28 promoted 19 failed 15 removed/2 kept
June 56 promoted 14 failed 16 removed/4 kept
July 6 promoted 1 failed 0 removed/0 kept

Devin Townsend discography

Nominator(s): Gendralman (talk) 00:47, 24 June 2009 (UTC)


I am renominating this for featured list. The first nomination didn't get very far, but I think the article's been improved quite a bit since I originally nominated it. I'd like to give this another shot. Gendralman (talk) 00:47, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

  • Comment -- I support based on my original review, but I'm still curious and puzzled about the inclusion of the discography of his other project. --Truco 503 00:47, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
  • My comments were resolved at the previous FLC; however, I am witholding my support due to concerns brought up by Drewcifer3000 (talk · contribs). I've contacted him, and when his concerns are resolved, I will support. Dabomb87 (talk) 01:16, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

Comments

I ran this article through AWB and found a couple of minor errors that I fixed. I will come back and look at it closer soon. --Kumioko (talk) 04:05, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
"{{DEFAULTSORT:Devin Townsend Discography}}" What does that do? —Gendralman (talk) 13:25, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
In this case Nothing I don't even know why it added it so I removed it. --Kumioko (talk) 14:55, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

Oppose for now—Only releases issued under the moniker "Devin Townsend" should be listed in this discography. The Strapping Young Lad stuff should go (that's meant for the SYL discography). indopug (talk) 06:29, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

Oppose - SYL discography should be separate, the mention of the band in the lead is enough to show his involvement. No sources for music videos, Other collaborations or Production credits and involvement on other albums sections. All Notes sections are entirely unsourced - of course some don't really require sources, such as the band's release name. If you went for a SYL discography FLC, you'd have a better chance in my opinion. k.i.a.c (talktome - contribs) 13:21, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

Comment: Just to put this in perspective, an SYL article would only have 17 entries, and List of awards and nominations received by Sam Roberts (a featured list with 24 entries) was delisted and merged for being too short. I'm totally willing to split it off, but I need an argument a little more substantial than "that's the way it should be". If I split off an SYL discography, I'm going to take that to FLC too, and I'd like to be reassured that it's not going to be deleted six months later like the Sam Roberts list was. —Gendralman (talk) 14:34, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

Consensus is that discographies are more deserving of stand-alone lists than awards lists are. Dabomb87 (talk) 14:44, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
  • OK, consider this a withdrawal for now. I'll split the article and nominate it again soon. Thanks for being patient with me, everyone. —Gendralman (talk) 23:51, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Closing note: This candidate has been withdrawn, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{FLC}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.
Personal tools

Visit joltnews for the latest headlines
Visit bloit.com for company information
Geed Media does computer consulting on long island.
This page viewed times. See Logs